AT&T launches 3G femtocell in Charlotte N.C.

3gmicrocellAT&T tried to start selling its new 3G femtocell quietly via its retail stores in one city this week, releasing details about the device on a new 3G Microcell website.  But despite the low-key launch there was an immediate hailstorm of coverage in the blogosphere / twitterverse and in the mainstream telecoms press.  AT&T’s 3G Microcell is attracting interest as the first 3G femtocell to be deployed in North America (despite Sprint’s recent claims that they would “definitely be first”).

As reported by Unstrung some time ago, and reiterated this week, the 3G Microcell is supplied by Cisco and incorporates ip.access’ femtocell technology.  Like the recently launched Vodafone Access Gateway, it’s a 4-user device with closed access.  But the 3G Microcell is more sophisticated than the VAG in a number of ways – for example:

  • It’s not just about coverage – AT&T offers an option of free calls from the femtocell for a monthly fee.
  • Users can verify that they are using the femtocell (and therefore getting free calls) by looking for the “AT&T M-Cell” alpha tag on their phone idle screen (there’s a picture here and below).
  • The provisioning and management systems are fully automated (for example the whitelist of authorised phones can be edited online by the end user).
  • The 3G Microcell incorporates a router to prioritise femtocell traffic over other Internet traffic in the home.
  • Location locking is enforced via GPS (just as with the Sprint and Verizon femtocells) – this is needed in the US due to regional spectrum licensing and strict location requirements for E911.

iphone_3gmJason Nash published the first end-user review of the 3G Microcell on Tuesday.  As well as a full description of the setup process, Jason explains the pricing…

3G Microcell price Monthly fee for unlimited minutes
$149 $0
$49 $20
$49 $10 (for customers with AT&T Internet)
$49 $0   (for customers with AT&T Internet and fixed telephony)

Here are some interesting snippets from Jason’s review…

  • “The difference [when using his cellphone at home] is night and day”
  • “$150 is a good investment in the productivity I’ll get back when co-workers or customers call me on my cell phone.”
  • “My sales rep, Nathan, was very helpful and mentioned they had sold 5 or so already that day.  Salisbury isn’t a big town so it shows the anticipation for the device.”

AT&T didn’t say much about the launch, but they did contact Engadget to explain that the pricing should be considered as a trial (implying that it could change before the device is launched nationwide).  After some false rumours about the pricing began to cause outrage on the Internet, an AT&T sales rep stepped in to clarify the situation.

You can’t buy the 3G Microcell from AT&T’s website, but you can enter a ZIP code to find out if it’s available in your area (Engadget reported that 28201 works, taking you to a list of 19 local stores where the device can be purchased).

The launch sparked off the now familiar storm of blog comments, divided between those who are outraged by the idea of having to pay to improve their mobile operator’s network coverage and those who think it’s a great idea.  Here’s a random sample of positive comments…

And here are a few of the negative ones…

[The last couple of comments highlight a common misconception – a lot of people think that their femtocell and broadband connection are being used to improve the network for everyone.  They don’t understand that the femtocell provides a personal signal just for their own family and friends.]

Some other interesting snippets…

What do the analysts think?

Here are a few additional coverage links in the telecoms and geek press:

Apple blog, CNET, DSL reports, Engadget (published lots of articles), EE Times, Fierce Wireless, Gearlog, Gizmodo, Information Week, Mobile Burn,PC Mag, Phonedog, Slashgear, TechWorld, Telecompetitor, Unstrung, Wireless Week , Zacks

Leave a Reply