More Sure Signal news
Several positive Sure Signal reviews have appeared on the web this week. James Hargrave calls it “an excellent and extremely useful product and good value for money at this price”. Mark Bridge on the fonecast blog calls the device “impressive”, and despite a slight reservation about paying Vodafone for the privilege of being able to make more calls, he is glad to have the choice; “Had I been using any other UK network, I could still be running upstairs every time I wanted to send a text,” he says. Meanwhile, Flora Graham on the Crave gadget blog notes how easy it is to set up and use the Sure Signal.
Moby1 believes Vodafone’s success in selling 100,000 iPhones in a single week is down to the quality of its 3G network, Sure Signal included. And if you happen to know what digit all standard UK mobile phone numbers begin with (here’s a clue – all UK mobile numbers start 07…), then you can enter The Independent’s competition to win a free Sure Signal femtocell.
DSL Prime reports comments by Free.fr founder Xavier Niel at a seminar organized by La Tribune. Apparently, he said that the company is ready to offer a femto as an option with the Freebox, even though they don’t expect to begin their 3G service until 2012. (There follows some wild speculation about femtocell prices.) There’s more on the Free Mobile femtocell here (in French).
ip.access announces plug’n'play picocell
Have you heard that picocells are expensive to deploy? This is the myth that some femtocell vendors are happy to perpetuate, but plug’n’play installation is not limited only to femtocells. ip.access has announced automated BTS pre-configuration for its nanoGSM picocells, enabling self-installation by the end customer with no specialist skills or on-site configuration. Once the customer has installed the picocell, it connects automatically to the BSC and can then come directly into service.
Current Analysis’ Peter Jarich says “We’ve long wanted ip.access to extend femto-type deployment supports to its nanoGSM product. Doing so has just made its market-leading picocell more competitive, and set the stage for more discussions around SON [self-organising networks] in the macro network.”
So, what exactly is the difference between a picocell and a femtocell? The clue is in the name – pico and femto refer to the size of the cell. Here’s a simple guide…
- femto = very small cell (home size)
- pico = somewhat larger cell (office size)
- micro = bigger still (public area hotspot)
- macro = biggest
So an ‘enterprise femtocell’ is a very small cell for use in offices, whereas a picocell is a somewhat larger cell (frequently also deployed in offices). Perhaps not everyone would agree with this definition, but the truth is that size is the only real distinction.
Vendors focus on data offload
W-Fi network equipment company BelAir Networks says mobile operators are embracing Wi‑Fi as a way to ease the strain on their 3G networks, and (rather oddly) that this will help them “gain experience in obtaining the property rights they will need” for the small cell sites required by LTE. Internet connections on AT&T’s Wi-Fi hotspots increased by a factor of 4 in 2009, with smartphones accounting for over 70% of connections in the fourth quarter.
Meanwhile Stoke Inc. has unveiled the Stoke Mobile Data Offload solution. It’s a new piece of network equipment that sits between the RNC and the SGSN, and diverts traffic bound for the Internet away from the mobile data core network.
Following a successful showing at the Consumer Electronics Show earlier this month, the Femto Forum has announced details of the FemtoZone at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. It will feature presentations from operators, vendors, analysts and other industry bodies, as well as public demos of femtocell applications. Here’s the video from CES, in which Vice Chairman Andy Germano talks about femto applications.
Aircell raises huge funding round
Aircell has raised a new funding round of an astonishing $176 million for its GoGo in-flight Wi‑Fi service offering. The service is provided by ground-based EV-DO basestations across the United States. Aircell says it will have 1400 planes equipped with its technology by the end of 2010. Can the company make money, when each plane costs $100k to fit? And why does the FCC allow this service when it still doesn’t allow on-board picocells, which are even less likely to interfere with the aircraft’s systems?
Consulting firm Northstream has tested TeliaSonera’s new commercial LTE network in Sweden and found that download speeds fall short of the promised “up to 50 Mbps.” The downlink reached 12 Mbps, with upload speeds clocking 5 Mbps. “It seems like the capacity drops off fast as the distance from a base station increases,” said Northstream CEO Bengt Nordström. (Looks as though having your own private base station at home would be a good idea, then.)
Location, location, location (is that all?)
Here’s an interesting new technology. WirelessWerx’s ‘location nodes’ (costing $80 each) are installed throughout a building in order to send accurate location information to the Public Safety Answering Point when someone dials 911. But why not just use femtocells, and get extra network coverage and capacity as well as accurate location?
In other news…
- GSA says there are now 22 HSPA femtocell products.
- BBC shows femto-enabled Connected Home application on Ubiquisys femtocell.
- IT PRO says femtocells mean the end of not-spots.
- Futurity Media says a surprising number of people are prepared to buy their own femtocell.
- ip.access interview with bnet.tv at CES.
- Oman Air launches full mobile phone and Wi-Fi connectivity.
- Global fixed broadband subscriptions will reach half a billion in 2010.
- AT&T to invest heavily in its mobile network.
- Mindspeed targets integrated baseband device for femtocells.
Tweets
Filed under: Market updates | Tagged: Aircell, BelAir Networks, Femto Forum, Femtocell, femtocells, Free Mobile, Gogo, ip.access, nanoGSM, Stoke, TeliaSonera, Vodafone Sure Signal, WirelessWerx | Leave a Comment »













